首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for depression in children and adolescents: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
【2h】

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for depression in children and adolescents: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

机译:心理治疗对儿童和青少年抑郁症的比较功效和可接受性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Previous meta-analyses of psychotherapies for child and adolescent depression were limited because of the small number of trials with direct comparisons between two treatments. A network meta-analysis, a novel approach that integrates direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled studies, was undertaken to investigate the comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for depression in children and adolescents. Systematic searches resulted in 52 studies (total N=3805) of nine psychotherapies and four control conditions. We assessed the efficacy at post-treatment and at follow-up, as well as the acceptability (all-cause discontinuation) of psychotherapies and control conditions. At post-treatment, only interpersonal therapy (IPT) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) were significantly more effective than most control conditions (standardized mean differences, SMDs ranged from -0.47 to -0.96). Also, IPT and CBT were more beneficial than play therapy. Only psychodynamic therapy and play therapy were not significantly superior to waitlist. At follow-up, IPT and CBT were significantly more effective than most control conditions (SMDs ranged from -0.26 to -1.05), although only IPT retained this superiority at both short-term and long-term follow-up. In addition, IPT and CBT were more beneficial than problem-solving therapy. Waitlist was significantly inferior to other control conditions. With regard to acceptability, IPT and problem-solving therapy had significantly fewer all-cause discontinuations than cognitive therapy and CBT (ORs ranged from 0.06 to 0.33). These data suggest that IPT and CBT should be considered as the best available psychotherapies for depression in children and adolescents. However, several alternative psychotherapies are understudied in this age group. Waitlist may inflate the effect of psychotherapies, so that psychological placebo or treatment-as-usual may be preferable as a control condition in psychotherapy trials.
机译:先前针对儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理治疗的荟萃分析是有限的,因为很少有试验可以直接比较两种治疗方法之间的比较。网络荟萃分析是一种整合来自随机对照研究的直接和间接证据的新颖方法,旨在研究心理疗法对儿童和青少年抑郁症的相对疗效和可接受性。系统搜索导致对九种心理治疗和四种控制条件进行了52项研究(总N = 3805)。我们评估了治疗后和随访时的疗效,以及心理治疗和控制条件的可接受性(全因停药)。在治疗后,只有人际交往治疗(IPT)和认知行为治疗(CBT)比大多数对照条件有效得多(标准化的均值差异,SMD介于-0.47至-0.96之间)。而且,IPT和CBT比游戏疗法更有益。仅心理动力疗法和游戏疗法没有明显优于候补名单。随访时,尽管短期和长期随访中只有IPT保留了这种优势,但IPT和CBT的疗效明显优于大多数对照条件(SMD介于-0.26至-1.05)。此外,IPT和CBT比解决问题的疗法更有益。候补名单明显不如其他控制条件。关于可接受性,与认知疗法和CBT相比,IPT和解决问题的疗法引起的全因停药明显更少(OR介于0.06至0.33之间)。这些数据表明,应将IPT和CBT视为儿童和青少年抑郁症的最佳可用心理疗法。然而,在这个年龄段的人中,对几种替代的心理治疗方法的研究不足。候补名单可能会加剧心理治疗的效果,因此在心理治疗试验中,首选心理安慰剂或常规治疗作为对照条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号